Tags: Good History Extended Essay QuestionsBusiness Plan Financial Plan TemplateMutual Funds EssaySarbanes Oxley EssaysAmerican Prohibition Act Of 1920 EssayProcess Essay On How To Carve A PumpkinFrederick Jackson Turner Thesis Statement
If so, this may be material that you will want to consider deleting or moving.Break up the section into logical segments by using subheads. We want you to answer a scientific question or hypothesis.
The writer must make it crystal clear to the reader which statements are observation and which are interpretation.
In most circumstances, this is best accomplished by physically separating statements about new observations from statements about the meaning or significance of those observations.
It is therefore important to write with the correct focus and emphasis.
Please refer to the other downloadable documents on the literature review for advice on this.
Alternatively, this goal can be accomplished by careful use of phrases such as "I infer ..." vast bodies of geological literature became obsolete with the advent of plate tectonics; the papers that survived are those in which observations were presented in stand-alone fashion, unmuddied by whatever ideas the author might have had about the processes that caused the observed phenomena.
This section should be rich in references to similar work and background needed to interpret results.You should conclude with an indication of how your research will address the issues raised in the review of existing research.The literature review should focus very clearly on existing research that has been done on the research area.You can't write a good introduction until you know what the body of the paper says.Consider writing the introductory section(s) after you have completed the rest of the paper, rather than before.You should draw the reader in and make them want to read the rest of the paper.The next paragraphs in the introduction should cite previous research in this area.This argument relates to the value of your research and to the methods you use to carry it out.It may also relate to the ways in which you have framed the work theoretically.Your results should be clearly defined and discussed in the context of your topic. You should place your analysis in a broader context, and highlight the implications (regional, global, etc.) of your work.We are looking for a well-reasoned line of argument, from your initial question, compilation of relevant evidence, setting data in a general/universal context, and finally making a judgment based on your analysis.